2cornucopias

Posts Tagged ‘Abortion’

Balmoral Kidnapping That Never Happened

In 13 History on 2011/10/07 at 1:00 AM

My husband and I do not have any children.  We began the long and tedious adoption process in the early seventies, but few children were available and the waiting lists were very long.

Years of fruitless waiting came to nought.  Barren Rachels “were weeping for their children, and they were not” ( Mt 2:18 ) just as in the days of the slaughter of the Innocents when Herod sought to kill the Savior.  Roe vs. Wade had become the law of the land, the abortion holocaust had begun and there simply were not many children available for adoption.

In 1984, my husband and I found ourselves in the lovely town of Balmoral, Scotland where the Queen has a residence.  While my pastry-loving husband ambled to the bakery shop, I headed for a local yarn shop.  There on the bottom of a series of steps, a young woman had left a beautiful baby boy of about 5 months in his pram.  Not a soul was around.

Now, after years of hoping, wishing and praying for a child, there right in front of me was a beautiful baby.  My first instinct was to take that baby and run as fast as I could with him.  But, I simply could not.  My hands could not reach out to grab him.  My feet felt as if they were shod in lead.  I was catatonic.  My mind, though, raced with thoughts about how I could smuggle him with me through customs.

Like two lawyers arguing a legal case, my mind stated one argument and then countered with another: “I have no right to take this child; it belongs to that young woman.”
Then, the counter-argument: “She can have others.”
Another counter: “It is morally wrong to take this child.  It’s a sin.”
And then came the truth I had been wrestling with: “But, I want this child.  She can have others.”

How long the debate went on, I simply do not know.  My face must have betrayed my internal struggle, for when my husband returned, he asked me what was wrong.  Without waiting for a response, he led me gently away and out of temptation’s path.

My ordeal was not yet over.

Back in California, I went to Mass one Sunday.  Having arrived a bit late, I slipped into the last pew.  A young woman asked me if I would watch her baby while she went to Communion.  There it was again . . . temptation.  At Mass, no less. I was in my home parish.  For a brief moment, I considered running away with that child.  I was absolutely sure I could slip out of the church and escape with that child.  But, I did not.  In spite of the temptation to give into my overwhelming desire to be a mother, I realized, and accepted at that moment, that it was not God’s will for me to be a mother . . . not this way, at least.  For me, the ordeal, the temptation to exercise my will over God’s in this particular matter, was over, the argument settled.

After years of struggling and longing for what I could not have, I finally accepted God’s will in the matter and continued teaching other peoples’ children for another 36 years.  I often think of the Scottish baby who would now be 27, but I’ve learned to think about and accept what is rather than dwell on what could have been.

Later, I shared this story with my high school students and, thanks be to God, several young girls told me that because of it, they gave their babies up for adoption rather than aborting them as others were encouraging them to do.  For me, that was a great consolation.

I’ve learned through these struggles that we are often tempted by our nature, by our good desires . . . something as pure and natural as being a mother.  The temptation lies not in the desire for something good, but rather in the desire to give more importance to those desires, to our wills, than God’s will.  I’ve learned that God often has something far better planned for us, something we might not even be able to imagine in the midst of our struggles.

We must never forget that God is always there, in the midst of our struggles and temptations, loving us.  He has only our good in mind.  Ours is simply to trust Him and to let Him love us.

The New Victims of Discrimination.

In 07 Observations on 2011/09/09 at 6:06 AM

By Linda Granzow

I recently attended the movie, “The Help”, which is set in Jackson, Mississippi at the height of civil rights unrest. Pitting a young white woman, Skeeter, whose conscience is finally opened to the reality of the discrimination against blacks, against her long-time friend, Hilly, whose lifestyle and aspirations hinge on the status quo, the author portrays the intense division that occurred in this country when people began to question and fight for what was right, not what was merely legal.

It is difficult to watch the way injustices can be committed against a particular group of human beings just because of race or religion or identity. At the time, it was “legal” to discriminate against blacks and to treat them as something less than fully human. When we look back at that time period, we are appalled that something like that could have ever been tolerated—that a cultural and societal mindset could have ever trumped the natural law of the dignity of every human person. Barbaric acts of torture and murder were committed by one group of human beings against another. This is also what happened in Nazi Germany against the Jews and in Rwanda against the Tutsis and this is the same action that has been happening since the early 1970’s against unborn babies.

It is “legal” in this country to discriminate against an unborn baby and withhold the basic civil right to life, treating the baby as something less than fully human. Whether living inside or outside of the mother’s womb, a baby is a human person. Even so, a cultural and societal mindset currently exists that trumps the natural law of the dignity of every human person. Barbaric acts of torture and murder are committed at the whim of one person against another, and what could be more appalling or unnatural than for a mother to commit this act against her own child? It contradicts the very nature of motherhood in which a mother would do anything to protect or save her child from danger.

Someday, people will look back at this time period and will be appalled that something like this was ever tolerated. During the 1960’s, it took great courage by whites and blacks alike to break the societal mindset and fight for the civil rights of the black people. It will take great courage now to break the current cultural mindset and fight for the civil rights of the unborn. The intense division in this country will continue until the consciences of more people are finally opened to the reality of abortion and they unite to reverse what is merely  “legal” in a fight for what is right.

Abortion, A Realistic Viewpoint by J. Reagan

In 08 Musings by Jack Reagan on 2011/06/04 at 8:00 PM

The accusation is often made that anti-abortion attitudes are a particular effort by the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church is the only church that is officially against abortion.  Few others make pro-life statements. The Catholic Church is demeaned, ridiculed, called “out of date”, “old-fashioned, “anti-woman”, “contra-cultural” and on and on.

The fact is that abortion is a moral evil, BUT NOT because the Catholic Church says it is. Abortion is an objective evil, and the Church is simply stating that fact. It is the natural moral law that all normal people sense that tells us that abortion is a moral evil. Abortion would be evil even if no religion opposed it. Abortion can be argued against successfully without even mentioning any religion because abortion is irrational.

What is to be thought of a nation that deliberately and legally kills off fifty million and still counting . . . 50,000,000 babies because they are inconvenient to someone? We rightly abhor the mass murders under Hitler, Stalin, Mao Tse-tung and others. Yet, in the U.S. it is quite legal to kill any unborn baby based merely on the mother’s wish. Peter Singer, a professor at Princeton, advocates a parental right to kill a child up to two years old if the parents think it is appropriate for them.

Legal abortion lessens the value of all human life. A few years ago in California, a request was made via TV to help a child in great need and a dog that was injured. The dog received from viewers far more money than the human child. If someone as inculpable as an unborn child can be legally killed, then who is really safe? (Ironically, most of those who support abortion are against capital punishment.) There is in Oregon a law that allows for assisted suicide. There is talk (and many say the actuality) of rationing health care in the Obama health care law. A person’s worth is to evaluated based on how much their medicine costs the taxpayer. Yet, this from a government that wastes billions every year.

Abortion leads to other naturally immoral actions. If you can kill a child, then the very idea of the immoral is diminished, and crimes against persons rise, especially crimes against women. When abortion is easily available, immoral sexual activity rises tremendously since any “mistakes” you make will be rectified by the abortionist. Every sexual sin seems to have increased in frequency with legal abortion and natural consequences like illegitimate children and sexually-transmitted disease.

A nation that condones abortion will see the impact of this evil as it spreads its negative effects throughout the nation. Since abortion is contrary to the natural moral law (as is any murder), it means that condoning abortion also violates the laws of right reasoning. Our national ability to think clearly, rationally and honestly is impaired. We begin to sanction other moral evils. We lose the ability even to see evil as evil and begin to rationalize its acceptance. Example: Same-sex marriage which is an oxymoron anyway. Those who are entrusted with preserving the common good offer solutions to problems that cannot solve the real problem. Example: The answer, for some, to any problem is to spend more money on it, failing to see that if money is not the cause of the problem, that money will not better the situation. A case in point is education at all levels. The answer to school problems is not more money, but better philosophy of education. It’s the ideas that are wrong, not the finances.

Feminism and the media are two of the most ardent and vocal proponents of abortion in the U.S.  Note that they never mention the adverse effects of abortion on the individual involved or the society as a whole, some of which can last a lifetime. These proponents always claim to be “in support of women.” What kind of  “friend” would allow a woman to deliberately choose a path of evil merely to vindicate a false philosophy. Another example of deficient thinking.

Abortion also has negative economic consequences. We have killed off part of an entire generation. The earliest victims would be in their thirties now. Most would be gainfully employed, paying taxes and supporting the Social Security Fund which is vanishing because of an insufficient number of younger contributors. As the population ages and abortion continues, the problem will not improve. Gradually, as the decline unfolds, government officials would have to take charge of more and more aspects of life, thereby diminishing our liberty and freedom more and more.

Ah, but abortion is legal: as it stands today, women  have the right to seek an abortion.  True, but what is the source of that “right”?  The Supreme Court.  However, the problem here is that no human group or group of humans can ever give anyone the “right” to violate a natural moral law.  The subordinate can never overturn the superior’s law.  Therefore, there is no valid right to abortion that would be sanctioned by the natural moral law.

About 70 years ago, Richard Weaver wrote a fascinating book entitled, “Ideas Have Consequences.” The theme was that negative and stupid ideas and philosophies lead to negative and stupid effects. Abortion was not an issue in his time, but were he alive now, I’m sure he would have had a chapter on the societal folly of abortion.

Those who advocate and practice abortion at any level do no individual or society any lasting good. Moral evil cannot lead to good effects.

When God issued the Ten Commandments, He did not make any mistakes. There is one Commandment that is specifically meant to preserve individuals and society: “Thou shall not kill”. The pro-abortion people care about neither.

The next time you hear somebody reject the idea of abortion on demand, realize that they are not being anti-anything; they are just exercising their power of correct reasoning.